WHERE WE ARE  
Parents and educators have been arguing over what and how
kids should learn ever since socialist progressive idealogues
began selling questionable and expensive curricular programs to
public schools paid for by increased taxation.

While they may lack educators' 30-minute online doctorates,
parents smart enough to buy houses and pay property taxes are
smart enough to know that kids need to learn basic math skills in
the same stepped progression that's worked for centuries.

The irony is that although most Math Wars parents and taxpayers
have confined their arguments to theoretical disagreements with
How we went from best to sub-par:  Long ago our
schools taught our kids to memorize basics & the classics.
We had a shared common culture; our citizens could think
for themselves, run their own farms, businesses.  This was
the great American constitutional republic that freed itself
from our British, French, Spanish & Mexican rulers.
P E Y T O N   W O L C O T T
The nation's 1st  & only daily conservative public education commentary   -   Solutions, not Fear
C O M M E N T A R Y  :  Our nation's move from local independent
schools towards nationalization -- and how we can stop it.
H O M E
ATTENTION EDUCATORS AND ADMINISTRATORS:
Every attempt possible has been made to verify all sources and information.   In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately.  Thank you.
NOTICE: All individuals mentioned on this site are presumed innocent unless they have been found guilty in a court of law.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.   We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of education issues vital to a republic.  We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law.  In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., Chapter 1, Section 107 which states:  the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any
other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright,"  the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.   If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use" you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Copyright 1999-2009 Peyton Wolcott
John Taylor Gatto 'splains it all
If you haven't seen it, here's an excerpt from
former New York Teacher of the Year John
Taylor Gatto's brief and entertaining
history
of U.S. public schools:
WHERE WE WERE
WHERE WE'RE HEADED
Socialiism, corruption, bad-ed ed. Our future, if we
continue down this path, is as a nation of serfs ruled by an
oligarchy who extend special privileges to the 10% elite
who live in
dachas, send their kids to classical lyceums--
The real makers of
modern schooling

weren't at all who we
think. Not Cotton Mather
or Horace Mann or
John Dewey (above
left).   The real makers
of modern schooling
were leaders of the
new American
industrialist class, men
like Andrew Carnegie,
the steel baron, John
D. Rockefeller, the
duke of oil, Henry Ford,
master of the assembly
line which compounded
steel and oil into a
Our first schools were simple one-room
structures, often affiliated with churches,
built by community members themselves.
(1) Socialist liberals
emphasize common good over individual
accomplishment, the team matters more
than the person. group  before individual
effort, socialism over a free market economy.
(2) Industrialists
Men like Rockefeller and Carnegie wanted
a compliant worker class, folks inured to
boredom by a dumbed-down curriculum
who'd show up, do their jobs--without
asking too many questions.
(3) Vendors
Thanks to crippling union demands coupled
with tougher environmental laws, most U.S.
industry has over the past half-century left
our shores for Asia and other friendlier
points abroad.  In fairness to them, who's
left for HP and other vendors to sell their
wares to if not public schools and other
governmental entities?
THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE SELF-INTEREST
-- THAT IS THE SPIRIT OF THE PROGRAM.   
BREAKING OF THE THRALDOM OF INTEREST --
THAT IS THE KERNEL OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM.
                         --Adolf Hitler, 1929
with everyone else deprived
of their personal freedoms and
fighting for meager resources
including bad schools, old
Havana-style cars & cheap
drink, doing shoddy work that
does not matter. Foreclosed
McMansions will be divvied
up into homes for multiple
families, and women will
dream dreams of QVC.
PROPOSED SCHOOL NATIONALIZATION SCHEME
Hey, Lou & Arne: Let's NOT abolish local
school districts or adopt national standards!
And how's about let's NOT become socialists!
15,000 school districts" -- without
offering any facts to back up his
assertion.  (In fairness to Lou,
how could he?  There aren't any.)

And by finding fault with the
structure of public education then
suggesting consolidation, Lou
isn't using any of that famous IBM
logic.  To consolidate 15,000
structures would simply lead to
70 really corrupt structures -- with
even less accountability than we
have at present.  

He says, " we continually fail to
scale up systemic change" as
though that's a bad thing.  As one
recent example, Mr. Obama is
attempting wholesale
widespread systemic change in
our nation's governance and a lot
of us don't like what he's doing
and how he's going about it.  



But in fairness to Lou, how could
he?

There are no statistics available
in the public school world
supporting cost-savings via
consolidation.  

Why?  In public schools even the
most promising  gains disappear
after the first year for one simple
reason:  Public schools have no
equivalent to IBM's floors of
Lessons From 40 Years of
Education 'Reform'
Let's abolish local
school districts and
finally adopt
national standards.
By Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
Wall Street Journal
December 1, 2008


















While the economic
news
has most Americans
in a state of near depression,
hope abounds today that the
country may use the current
economic crisis as leverage
to address some
longstanding problems.
Nowhere is that prospect for
progress more worthy than
the crisis in our public
education system.

So, from someone who
realized rather glumly last
week that he has been
working at school reform for
40 years, here is a
prescription for leadership
from the Obama
administration.

We must start with the
recognition that, despite
decade after decade of
reform efforts, our public
K-12 schools have not
improved. We can point to
individual schools and some
entire districts that have
advanced, but the system as
a whole is still failing. High
school and college
graduation rates, test
scores, the number of
graduates majoring in
science and engineering all
are flat or down over the
past two decades.
Disappointingly, the relative
performance of our students
has suffered compared to
those of other nations. As a
former CEO, I am worried
about what this will mean for
our future workforce.

It is most crucial for our
political leaders to ask why
we are at this point -- why
after millions of pages, in
thousands of reports, from
hundreds of commissions
and task forces, financed by
billions of dollars, have we
failed to achieve any
significant progress?

Answering this question
correctly is the key to finally
remaking our public schools.

This is a complex problem,
but countless experiments
and analyses have clearly
indicated we need to do four
straightforward things to
bring fundamental changes
to K-12 education:

1) Set high academic
standards for all of our kids,
supported by a rigorous
curriculum.

2) Greatly improve the quality
of teaching in our
classrooms, supported by
substantially higher
compensation for our best
teachers.

3) Measure student and
teacher performance on a
systematic basis, supported
by tests and assessments.

4) Increase "time on task" for
all students; this means more
time in school each day, and
a longer school year.

Everything else either does
not matter (e.g., smaller class
sizes) or is supportive of
these four steps (e.g., vastly
improve schools of
education).

Lack of effort is not the
cause of our 30-year inability
to solve our education
problem. Not only have we
had all those thousands of
studies and task forces, but
we have seen many
courageous and talented
individuals pushing hard to
move the system. Leaders
such as Joel Klein (New
York City), Michelle Rhee
(Washington, D.C.) and Paul
Vallas (New Orleans) have
challenged the system, and
elected officials from both
sides of the political
spectrum have also fought
valiantly for change.

So where does that leave
us? If the problem isn't "what
to do," nor is it a failure of
commitment, what is stopping
us?

I believe the problem lies with
the structure and corporate
governance of our public
schools. We have over
15,000 school districts in
America; each of them, in its
own way, is involved in
standards, curriculum,
teacher selection, classroom
rules and so on. This
unbelievably unwieldy
structure is incapable of
executing a program of
fundamental change. While
we have islands of
excellence as a result of
great reform programs, we
continually fail to scale up
systemic change.

Therefore, I recommend that
President-elect Barack
Obama convene a meeting of
our nation's governors and
seek agreement to the
following:

- Abolish all local school
districts, save 70 (50 states;
20 largest cities). Some
states may choose to leave
some of the rest as
community service
organizations, but they
would have no direct
involvement in the critical
task of establishing
standards, selecting
teachers, and developing
curricula.

- Establish a set of national
standards for a core
curriculum. I would suggest
we start with four subjects:
reading, math, science and
social studies.

- Establish a National Skills
Day on which every third,
sixth, ninth and 12th-grader
would be tested against the
national standards. Results
would be published
nationwide for every school
in America.

- Establish national standards
for teacher certification and
require regular
re-evaluations of teacher
skills. Increase teacher
compensation to permit the
best teachers (as measured
by advances in student
learning) to earn well in
excess of $100,000 per
year, and allow school
leaders to remove
underperforming teachers.

- Extend the school day and
the school year to effectively
add 20 more days of
schooling for all K-12
students.

I can predict that three
questions will be raised
about these measures:

First, how can we set
national standards when we
have a strong tradition of
local school autonomy? The
answer is that the American
people are way ahead of our
politicians here: Poll after poll
shows they support national
standards.

Second, won't this take many
years to implement? No, if
we follow a focused,
pragmatic approach. While
ideally we want all 50 states
to participate, we can get
started with 30. The rest will
be driven to abandon their
"see no evil" blinders by their
citizens as the original group
achieves momentum and
success. Moreover, we do
not have to start from
scratch on the national
standards. Experts can
quickly develop an initial set
just by drawing on existing
domestic and foreign
programs.

Third, how do we pay for all
of this? In three ways: We
will save billions by
consolidating the operations
of 15,000 school districts.
The U.S. Department of
Education can direct all of its
discretionary funds to this
effort. And we need to drive
into the consciousness of
every American politician that
education is not an expense.
It is, rather, the most
important investment we can
make as a country.

H.G. Wells remarked that
"history is a race between
education and catastrophe."
For the first time in America's
history, we may be losing
that race. We can win, but
we have to act quickly and
decisively.

Mr. Gerstner, a former CEO
of IBM, was chairman of the
Teaching Commission
(2003-2006), which reported
on ways to improve the
quality of public school
teaching.
Couple Mr. Obama's September 8
curriculum-accompanied address
to America's schoolchildren with
new Secretary of Education Arne
Duncan's recent call for nationalized
standards and this suddenly
becomes a great time to examine
Consolidation detriment #1:
But which & whose national standards?
Because there's no there already there in American public schools, because we
as a nation have no previously agreed-on absolute national standards already
set in place, the introduction of national standards now, at this late date, far from
being a strictly educational change, would be, after 233 years, an imposition that
given the crucial role played by our public schools would slide us into oligarchy,
socialism and fascism.  
(L) 1950s Russian peasants admire privileged
elite.
(Life Magazine)  Mr. Obama's 31 White House
"Czars"
(IMAGE--Taxpayers for Common Sense/Fox News)
1906:  Baltimore's Oblate Sisters started
evening classes for "Bobbin Girls" and
"Breaker Boys" working in textile factories.
Victorian-era school room
Traditional or fuzzy?  History or social studies?  What kind of math will Mr. Gerstner's proposed national
standards include?  Will it be time-proven traditional math which teaches facts or will it be the National
Classroom Teachers of Mathematics' fuzzy non-traditional standards emphasizing process instead,
US DOE Secretary Arne
Duncan (L)  Mr. Obama (R)
Adolf Hitler with schoolchildren
Why would national standards be a problem now?  
While it's easy to see that the implied neatness and Excel spreadsheet mathe-
matical tidiness of a precise set of national standards might likely hold a
certain plausible appeal for CEOs like Mr. Gerstner, kind of like running a corpo-
ration without having to answer to shareholders, extrapolating this out, such a
CEO might also enjoy living in a dictatorship -- provided he gets to be dictator.  
the two chief pratfalls in Mr. Gerstner's and Mr. Duncan's consolidation/national standards scheme.   (the
first and most crucial step towards federal takeover of our local schools
such process contributing to half the kids now entering college needing
remedial instruction in core subjects such as math?  

Or, what about history?  Will the proposed national standards include
the study of history -- real events that happened to real people -- or its
fuzzier sibling, social studies?  Will the proposed national standards
align with the camp advocating that third-graders receive a study page
on Sheryl Crow as occurred in one upscale exemplary Texas school not
so long ago? If so, will the proposed standards change when the rock
star changes her T-shirt to reflect favor or disfavor with each new
president and each new war, if Ms. Crow likes Mr. Obama's Afghan war?
BOTTOM
LINE:  
He who
writes and
funds the
standards
controls the
outcome.
Sheryl Crow
Consolidation detriment #2:
Fraud & waste
Fewer school districts -- Mr. Gerstner
wants only one per state plus another
20 for each of our biggest cities (like
Detroit or Chicago, maybe?) -- will
result in bigger
piles of money with
fewer eyes watching not only the money
but also the pencils, erasers and
laptops. Ever-larger piles of money
attract ever more comers.  

It may surprise you to learn that not
each and every vendor is putting our
kids' and taxpayers' best interests
ahead of their own.  

And we've seen from public school
scandals involving federal funds that
bureaucrats are at best indifferent
stewards of other people's money
compared to the people paying the
taxes.

No-account accountability
Unlike IBM and every other major viable
American business where there are
floors if not buildings filled with bean
counters making sure every purchase
has all I's dotted and T's crossed, just
the opposite is true of public schools.
The trail of $4.3 million from Utah's Davis School District to Susan G. and
John Ross via two shell companies (Research & Development, Inc. and
Notable Education Writing Service, Inc.) depicted at right in local NBC TV
station KSL's graphic omits two crucial groups:  (1) The United States
Department of Education which sends billions in Title I and other federal
funds to school districts such as Davis SD and (2) Davis SD superintendent
W. Bryan Bowles and his 7-member school board who bear ultimate
responsibility for spending and overseeing the millions receives in Title I --
and other state, federal and local -- funds
De-Consolidation the answer, not consolidation
Whether it be three-way transactions involving moonlighting superintendents and 501(c) corporations, or
embezzlements involving millions including unsupervised Title I funds, or a fishing boat used as a lure
for a major urban district's technology chief's control of E-Rate dollars, there are reasons aplenty such as
these examples below why de-consolidation rather than consolidation is the better direction for public
education.   

Consolidation merely creates more opportunities for more fraud and less accountability.

The proof is in the pudding.  Not one of our major urban districts are doing well; not even Eli Broad --
despite his foundation's handsomely publicized $1 million annual prize -- can give us a detailed
quantitative assessment as to how he picks his winners.  
MOONLIGHTING
SUPE'S TIES TO
501(c) VENDORS
(CALIFORNIA)
MOONLIGHTING
ADMINISTRATORS'
TIES TO TITLE I
FUNDS (UTAH)
You're tempted to pity
poor Anthony Amato.   
First it was New
Orleans, then Kansas
City, now it's his new
gig as superintendent
of California's
Stockton USD
(located between San
Francisco and
Yosemite).  

The trouble this time
appears to arise from
Anthony's recommen-
dation that Stockton
USD spend $12
million on a product
from a client of his
part-time employer,
Education Research
& Development
Institute (ERDI), a
501(c) corporation,
the same product he
also recommended to
prior bosses in
Kansas City and New
Orleans where he
testified last month in
the bribery trial of
Mose Jefferson, the
brother of former
Congressman
William Jefferson,
regarding the selling
of yet another 501(c)
corporation's
education product, "I
Can Learn" software.  
(SOURCE--Michael
Luke/WWLTV.com)
The Stockton product,
produced by Success
for All, one more 501(c)
corporation, turns out
to have not been
approved by the State
of California; when
SUSD discovered this
they dropped the
product.
(SOURCE--
KCRA.com)   
In Anthony's
defense, Success for
All's product is included
in the What Works
Clearinghouse, part of
the United States
Department of
Education.  In what can
only be described as
interesting timing,
WWC just last month
released a new report
on Success for All.

Propitious, that.
advantage of lax state,
federal and local over-
sight of Title I funds
intended for disadvan-
taged minority and
disabled students,
funneling $4.3 million into
their private coffers during
2000 to 2005.

As Utah's former state
coordinator of Title I and
Migrant Education for the
Utah State Office of
Education, in his next gig
as Davis School District's
federal grant writer, John
was in a unique position
to identify and funnel
funds to his wife via two
shell corporations they
allegedly established,
Research & Development
Consultants, Inc. and
Notable Education Writing
Service (NEWS).  
Federal prosecutors have
charged long-time
educators Susan G. Ross
and her husband John
Ross (below) with taking
Pilfering may have
begun in 1985;
Susan's copycat
secretary.
"Federal investigators
suspect that the Ross's
pilfering dates to
1985, and they fear that
millions more will remain
unaccounted for.  With
audits required yearly and
school-board approval
needed to sign off on
most purchases, the
question looms of how
John Ross and his wife,
Susan, could have carried
out the alleged scheme
year after year, according
to prosecutors."
 (Ibid.)  
Susan had worked for
Davis schools from the
1970s until 2006 when
"auditors found federal
money was going to a
company that didn't
appear to be a viable
business NEWS.  Davis
superintendent Bryan
Bowles said he
immediately asked Susan
Ross — John Ross had
already retired —about
embezzlement and she
denied it. Bowles said the
next day she went on
vacation and never
returned to work."
(SOURCE--
Tiffany Erickson, Jennifer Toomer-
Cook, Joseph M. Dougherty/Deseret
Morning News)
Another federal indictment
"charges that Susan
Ross' secretary, Stella
Smith, had a separate
scheme running.
According to a 37-count
indictment, Smith
submitted paperwork to
the school district to have
E.B. Smith Co. approved
as a vendor. Using that
company name, Smith
submitted purchase
orders for books that had
not been requested by
district employees.  Once
purchase orders were
issued, according to the
indictment, Smith mailed
fraudulent invoices
showing that E.B. Smith
Co. had supplied
the books. However, no
such books were
delivered. The indictment
says that Smith collected
about $338,000 in
fictitious book purchases
between 1999 and 2005.
Smith faces up to 20 years
in prison for each count of
mail fraud.  
(Ibid.)
ANOTHER
MOONLIGHTING
SUPE'S TIES TO
OTHER 501(c)
VENDORS (TEXAS)
During Hector
Montenegro's brief
(six-month) tenure last
year as Arlington ISD
superintendent he
persuaded his
cash-strapped district
(they were $20 million in
the hole at the time) to
purchase $240,000 in
education programs from
501(c) vendor HOPE, an
outfit he'd also accepted
speaking honorariums
from -- in violation of a
new state law.

As it turns out another
issue was Hector's
relationship with two
other 501(c) vendors,
AVID and Education
Research &
Development Institute
(ERDI); although he
sought legal opinions
from Texas Association
of School Administrators
attorney Neal Adams, the
opinion apparently came
too late as Hector quit his
contractual employment
agreement with Arlington
ISD without a buyout after
his dispute with his
board became the stuff of
local headlines for
months.

Contracts resulting from
his ERDI, HOPE and
AVID contacts were
potentially worth millions
to the vendors.
BOOKKEEPER'S $3.4
MILLION EMBEZZLE-
MENT FORCES
4-DAY SCHOOL
WEEK (NEW MEXICO)
Although the tiny (485
K-12) students district was
chronically behind in its
bookkeeping, audits have
been clean, including one
released three months
ago, and the loss was not
discovered until New
Mexico State Auditor
Hector Balderas stepped
in.   The scheme appears
to have centered on 538
checks stolen from the
district and made payable
to Kathy and others; the
district's superintendent for
much of the period
involved was her cousin
Robert Archuleta, now
working elsewhere.  
Balderas has also
announced an
investigation of Northwest
Regional Educational
Cooperative #2 where
Kathy also worked as
business manager.

The Rio Grande Sun has
called for the resignation
of the entire school board
(see greybar at right) or a
recall election.  Although
board members have
refused to take
responsibility for their
roles, trustee Mark
Valdez said recently, "Now,
obviously, I really want to
educate myself more on
finances.”  No telling when
he'll get the chance as the
state DOE has taken over
Jemez bookkeeping.
With only a $4.2 million
annual budget, even  
Jemez Mountain School
District had sufficient
funds coming in that for
seven years no one in a
leadership position
appears to have noticed
the loss of $3.4 million
from their coffers.
Kathy Borrego (top);
Robert Archuleta
Anthony Amato
(GRAPHIC-Willamette Weekly)
Hector Montenegro (L) at
TALAS reception in his honor
at Jan. 2008 edu-conference
District is much smaller (a
$4.2 million annual than
the three described at left,
their long-time bookkeeper
Kathy Borrego has been
charged with embezzling
$3.4 million over seven
years from a $4.2 annual
operating budget.

The loss has already had
at least two major effects:  
Along with closing an
elementary school, the
district has had to move to
a four-day school week.  
Davis USD (CA) school board meeting
(PHOTO--Peyton Wolcott)
low-level administrators and teachers, in reality curriculum-purchasing decisions rest in the hands of the
superintendent and the majority handful votes he or she needs on the school board.
Susan and John Ross
(PHOTOS--Sarah Ause/Deseret News)
YACHTGATE:  TECH
EXEC'S TIE TO $120
MILLION E-RATE
VENDOR (TEXAS)
09.17.09 STATUS (ROSS)
According to Melodie Rydalch, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's
office in Salt Lake City, the next hearing is a motion tomorrow,
September 18; John Ross is seeking to separate his case from
his wife's; according to legal pundits, this is because women
traditionally receive lighter sentences.

09.17.09 STATUS (SMITH)
Stella has pleaded guilty to mail fraud which carries a possible
20-year sentence and a $250,000 fine.  Although she has
agreed to repay Davis SD $324,579.28, she will not be
sentenced until the Ross cases conclude; theoretically she may
be legally able to float the due amount for as long as the Rosses
manage to stretch out their respective trials.   According to
Rydalch, "Once [Stella Smith] is sentenced, that is something
U.S. Probation will monitor based on what the judge orders at
sentencing. "
While streamlining polyglot state standards into one smooth national set might seem to some a logical
next step, a means of consolidating the vagaries and weaknesses of the No Child Left Behind Act, for
many of us not only should NCLB itself be discarded but also the United States Department of Education
and E-Rate and other federal funding to local schools along with it.  Billions of dollars later, the
de-segregation issues the feds sought to correct still exist.
Ark where the Ark of the
Covenant disappears into a
vast government warehouse
never to be seen again.  

For the fearless among you,
try holding Los Angeles
Unified or New York City
schools accountable; see
how long it takes to get
anyone to respond to your
phone call, let alone obtain
any substantive information.
 

Not only will consolidating
our 15,000 local school
districts not save us a
single sou (more re why
below), but for
self-governing free citizens
of a representational
republic, nationalized
schools are also troubling,
a flat-out bum notion.
bean counters looking out for IBM's best interests;
once folks figure out how to access the larger pot
of money consolidation creates, the same fraud
and excesses begin to reoccur -- but now there
are fewer responsible eyes watching.  A good
analogy is the warehouse scene from the end of
Raiders of the Lost
Ark of the Covenant disappearing into WW II-era
government warehouse.
 (IMAGE--Raiders of the Lost Ark)
commercial interests, compromised
trustees and administrators, and
politicians.  Students' time and
energy are wasted on fluff. Rather
than learning basics, self-reliance
and individual effort, feelings &
process are emphasized and kids
are taught to be part of a team and
get jobs.
By Peyton Wolcott
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
NOTE FROM
PEYTON:
Louis
Gerstner told us what
he wanted to do
almost a year ago;
from his mouth to
God's ear it appears.
As you read this, look
for signs of logic &
accountability;
I couldn't find any;
Lou starts from a
flawed premise and
builds from there.
 
--Peyton
Arne Duncan and Lou Gerstner are pushing for national standards and consolidation: Bye-bye local rule.  
Bye-bye self-determinism.  Hello, central oligarchy.
Today, Education, Inc. focuses more on adults' money,
power and careers than our kids. Our nation's Taj Mahal public schools are run by a corrupt oligarchy of
Lou Gerstner (L) & Arne Duncan
Havana street today
Just as the CIA listens for signs of increased chatter in
certain quarters, so too those of us wanting better
schools also keep our ears keened for trouble.
Some of the most
disquieting comes from
three corrupt urban
centers -- New York,
Chicago and DC
-- centering around a
White House with more
AIG & SunAmerica financial tycoon
and housing magnate
Eli Broad (L)
with Arne Duncan at Broad Jan.
2009 inaugural dinner; Broad gave
Democrats $115,437 in 2008.
(PHOTO
--
Stuart  Ramson)
Let's face it. The natural end game of consolidating
schools and standards -- nationalization -- carries
at least three worrying implications.

Social progressives in this country have always
wanted a centralized national system.  One, it’s
easier to indoctrinate children when they're all on the
same page.  Two, he who funds the formula gets to
write the formula and therefore controls the outcome.
Three, by eliminating local control you get rid of
pesky moms and dads able to ask questions about
Johnny’s textbooks and noisy taxpayers wanting and
expecting a real dialogue about spending.  
From Lou’s pen to Arne’s mouth
Last December when former IBM CEO Louis Gerstner called for national standards and
consolidation (see greybar at far right); he suggested that the new president convene
More about the
feds' push for
national standards
The Common Core
State Standards
Initiative, a massive
conglomerate of
business and political
special interests, is  
spearheaded by the
National Governors
Association and the
Council of Chief State
School Officers, along
with Achieve, Inc.,
ACT, and the College
Board.

To their credit, four
states—Alaska, Texas,
South Carolina
and Missouri—have
declined to participate.
(SOURCE--CCSSO)
Eli Broad's 42
contributions
to Democrats
(total$115,437)
during 2008;
question:
aren't 501(c)3
organizations
supposed to
not be
political?

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 N/A $10,000
10/18/2008 P
DEMOCRATIC STATE
CENTRAL
COMMITTEE OF CA -
FEDERAL - Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024  $-5,000
09/22/2008 P
HILLARY CLINTON
FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATION $2,300
08/28/2008 P
FRIENDS OF HILLARY
- Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Self
employed/Founder
$5,000 07/30/2008 P
HILLARY CLINTON
FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$2,000 07/11/2008 P
WESPAC - SECURING
AMERICA'S FUTURE

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 ELI BROAD
FOUNDATION/PHILAN
TROPIST $900
06/23/2008 P JEANNE
SHAHEEN FOR
SENATE - Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$2,500 06/02/2008 P
SOLIDARITY PAC

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$1,000 03/31/2008 G
FRIENDS OF
CONGRESSMAN
GEORGE MILLER -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$10,000 02/29/2008 P
DEMOCRATIC
CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN
COMMITTEE -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATION/FOUND
ER $200 01/22/2008 P
FRIENDS OF
SENATOR CARL
LEVIN - Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATION/FOUND
ER $2,300 01/22/2008
G FRIENDS OF
SENATOR CARL
LEVIN - Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90049 BROAD
FOUNDATION/FOUND
ER $2,300 11/29/2007
P FRIENDS OF MARK
WARNER - Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 BROAD
FOUNDATION/FOUND
ER $1,300 11/21/2007
P FRIENDS OF MAX
BAUCUS - Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$1,000 10/29/2007 G
FRIENDS OF RAHM
EMANUEL - Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90049 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$10,000 10/12/2007 P
DEMOCRATIC
CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN
COMMITTEE -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SunAmerica
Inc./Chairman $1,000
09/21/2007 P
SHERMAN FOR
CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$1,000 09/19/2007 P
BERMAN FOR
CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli Mr.
LOS ANGELES,, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundations/SELF
EMPLOYED $1,000
09/18/2007 P BUCK
MCKEON FOR
CONGRESS -
Republican

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundations/Founder
$2,000 08/27/2007 P
L A PAC - None

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SUNAMERICA,
INC./EXECUTIVE
$1,000 08/14/2007 P
FRIENDS OF MAX
BAUCUS - Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Eli
Broad/Entrepeneur
$2,100 07/13/2007 P
MATSUI FOR
CONGRESS -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90291 THE BROAD
FOUNDATION/FOUND
ER $2,300 06/25/2007
P RICHARDSON FOR
PRESIDENT INC. -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$2,300 06/14/2007 P
LUCILLE
ROYBAL-ALLARD
FOR CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundations/Founder
$5,000 06/01/2007 P
FUND FOR THE
MAJORITY
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Executive
$2,300 05/30/2007 G
NANCY PELOSI FOR
CONGRESS -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Executive
$2,300 05/30/2007 P
NANCY PELOSI FOR
CONGRESS -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Broad
Foundations/Founder
$1,000 05/30/2007 P
FRIENDS OF
PATRICK J. KENNEDY
INC. - Democrat
BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SUN
AMERICA/CHAIRMAN,
CEO & PRESIDE
$2,437 05/01/2007 P
LAUTENBERG FOR
SENATE - Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Broad
Foundation/Founder
$2,500 04/30/2007 P
SECUREUS
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$15,000 04/30/2007 P
DEMOCRATIC
CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN
COMMITTEE -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Self
employed/Founder
$2,300 03/28/2007 G
HILLARY CLINTON
FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Self
employed/Founder
$2,300 03/28/2007 P
HILLARY CLINTON
FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundations/Founder
$1,000 03/27/2007 P
CHRIS DODD FOR
PRESIDENT INC -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Broad
Foundation/Chairman-
Founder $1,200
03/26/2007 P TOM
VILSACK FOR
PRESIDENT -
Democrat
BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATIONS/FOUN
DER $200 03/23/2007
P FRIENDS OF
BARBARA BOXER -
Democrat
BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATIONS/FOUN
DER $200 03/23/2007
G FRIENDS OF
BARBARA BOXER -
Democrat
BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SUNAMERICA
INSURANCE
CO/PRESIDENT/C
$2,300 03/16/2007 P
CITIZENS FOR
HARKIN - Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$2,300 02/16/2007 P
FRIENDS OF
CONGRESSMAN
GEORGE MILLER -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$200 02/16/2007 G
FRIENDS OF
CONGRESSMAN
GEORGE MILLER -
Democrat
Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad
Foundation/Founder
$2,300 02/16/2007 P
FRIENDS OF RAHM
EMANUEL - Democrat
BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATION/FOUND
ER $10,000
02/15/2007 P
DEMOCRATIC
SENATORIAL
CAMPAIGN
COMMITTEE -
Democrat
BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD
FOUNDATIONS/FOUN
DER $2,100
01/12/2007 P
FRIENDS OF
SENATOR CARL
LEVIN - Democrat
This comes at the same
time as our White House
is intent on expanding
federal powers in a push
driven by more czars than
in all of Russian history, a
putsch into whose hands
the concentration of ever
more money and power
will be given to an
oligarchical elite via
consolidation and
national standards of our
local schools gives
pause.  
vehicular dynasty, and J.P. Morgan, the king of
capitalist finance.  Men like these, and the brilliant
efficiency expert Frederick W. Taylor, who
inspired the entire "social efficiency" movement of
the early twentieth century, along with providing
the new Soviet Union its operating philosophy and
doing the same job for Fascist Italy and Nazi
Germany; men who dreamed bigger dreams than
any had dreamed since Napoleon or Charlemagne,
these were the makers of modern schooling.
United under"It's for the children" banner:
o socialist liberal idealogues
o industrialists wanting compliant workers
o vendors facing shrinking markets
3 factors that swamped
U.S. public education
HOW WE CAN STOP NATIONALIZATION: The fix is
already in at the state and national levels.  Start small, start
local and start simple. Start in your own local public
schools by asking questions.  Get rid of fuzzy math. Make
sure kids are drilled in the basic math tables in the first four
grades and that they're learning phonics and accurate U.S.
and world history. Get the check register online. Take a
piece of what's closest to you and start asking questions, all
kinds of questions about spending.  Go about all of this with
as friendly a tone as you can manage, and be sure to take
the Golden Rule with you.  This is my plan. What's yours?
czars than in all of Russian history wanting to
concentrate ever more money and power in the
hands of an oligarchical elite via consolidation and
national standards for our public schools.
a meeting of our nation‘s
governors and persuade
them to adopt national
standards and consoli-
date our 15,000 local
school districts into 70.  

Apparently someone at
the White House was
listening -- or was it a
decade of money (see
graph at right) given to
liberal politicians?

From Arne's mouth
to state reality
However it happened, as
if on cue, by this past June
Liberal education lobbying has almost quintupled in just 2 decades.
new Secretary of Education Arne Duncan was at a podium -- surprise, surprise --
proposing national standards --
surprise, surprise -- to the Governors Education
Symposium.  In Arne's hand, a big carrot:  
$ 350 million in stimulus funds for those
state leaders greedy enough to go along.  (For the politically naive among you, as I
myself was until well into adulthood, every dollar that passes through a governor's
hands represents dollars for repaying friends, contracts and favors.  Much as we'd like
to hope that every penny of the $350 million will go to the best and most deserving
projects, the simple fact is that Ideas' purity fade when government money is attached.)

The implication of course is that for those governors willing to go along they'll get a
bigger slice of the larger prize, $4.35 billion, or even some of the $100 billion total feds
are earmarking for education.

Forty-six governors in need of repaying friends, contracts and favors have already
signed on to Arne's national standards scheme.

Developing . . . .
Hitler Youth